The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo You Decide on the Adventure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no evidence these books meet WP:BK. --EEMIV (talk) 14:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The books do meet a single WP:BK criteria, namely the threshold criteria of having ISBN numbers, but as the guideline states, that's not enough on its own to merit an article. KaySL (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, all are unnotable books and fail WP:BK and WP:N, with no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Existing does not make them notable. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 18:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: notability not established with third-party reliable sources. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 00:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sources are now provided to show they exist. Maybe we can merge with Nintendo Adventure Books this article. --Victory93 (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: as Collectonian pointed out earlier, "existing does not make them notable", and they fail WP:BK on every count bar one, which isn't enough to merit inclusion on Wikipedia. Perhaps they can be merged into Nintendo Adventure Books as you say; I'd advise taking a copy of the page as it currently exists just in case you plan to do the merging work. KaySL (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.