The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written, not notable, contains no useful information Mackan 16:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:WEB. --Porqin 16:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If any of the info is useful, it should go in Newgrounds. --Allen 16:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with possible merge of useful information per Allen. Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 16:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and merge any useable information as per Allen. Canadian-Bacon 16:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Allow me to add there is no useable information in the article at all. If you have a look at it, you will know what I mean. The Newgrounds article already has a chapter on the Newgrounds BBS (which I think is too big already). Mackan 16:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd disagree that the section in Newgrounds is to big, in fact it hardly takes up a paragraph but I don't think that's worth argueing about at the moment. Canadian-Bacon 16:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete nothing worth merging. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Bigtop 18:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Honestley I think with alot of fine tunning this could be a working article. It's a HUGE part of the site and the small version barley mentioned any info. I mean if something awful forums have a topic why shouldn't newgrounds?--CartoonDiablo 21:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Cartoondiablo[reply]
• Comment. huh after comming back I think it's fairley working and definitley dosen't need deletion with all of it's improvements and such. --CartoonDiablo 17:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)cartoondiablo[reply]

No. It's still worthless as an encyclopedic article. Sorry, but don't take this too personally. I know you wrote the article and you might feel bad about your hard work being deleted, but Wikipedia works like this and it could happen to anyone. Mackan 02:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This article is useless to Wikipedia. It should be deleted, there is no reason to have an entire article on Wikipedia about a website's forum. I am aware that there is a "Something Awful" forum article but it is much larger than the Newrounds BBS and will be to difficult to delete though I think it should be deleted as well. Overall, this article is pointless and definitely should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvisganon (talk • contribs) 04:25, 5 August 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.