The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NetMovers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Previously deleted in 2009 as such, recreated a week ago with two new claims - 1 is a press release (the 2011 ref) and the other is a link to NetMovers own website. Syrthiss (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Added more notible sources, I will also be adding more shortly. Friskuk (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)copied over from the talk page of this page by me Syrthiss (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. SPAMish and WP is not a business directory. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems like an obvious delete to me.JoelWhy (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.