The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions have no basis in Wikipedia guidelines or policy, unlike the "delete" opinions, and so are discounted.  Sandstein  05:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

National Anthem of Northern Province (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no National anthem of the Northern Province. Provinces in Sri Lanka do not have anthem, let alone this being a national anthem... Page created by a disruptive, and now blocked user. Blackknight12 (talk) 06:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. The article itself states that there is no national anthem for the province and merely mentions several songs "proposed", without identifying the parties which have undertaken such a project. A google search also failed to verify whether there is an official preparation to declare one sooner or later. ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 15:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Astronomyinertia is canvassed by the nominator[1].Hillcountries (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: quite simply stated in the article it self that there is no national anthem. Furthermore there are on reliable sources here. Cossde (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Cossde is canvassed by the nominator[2].Hillcountries (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No reason to delete. 76.64.229.109 (talk) 11:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can you give a reason to keep then?--Blackknight12 (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article should be kept, but a proper title should be introduced.Hillcountries (talk) 11:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There have been no talk of this and neither are there sources.--Blackknight12 (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.