The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Wescoat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The article reads like a vanity piece, and any attempts I or other editors had made to make the article more encyclopedic have been quickly reverted without discussion. Regardless, the sources provide little evidence of notability. The extreme makeover link just goes to the episode video, and there's no mention in any media coverage elsewhere. The Art Business News is a directory listing in a non-notable publication and there's no article or interview listed in artist-market.com. And since search results are still considered by some as a mark of notability, note that while a Google search initially indicates 19,000+ hits, paging to the end of the results shows there are only about 400, along with a handful of News results. Flowanda | Talk 20:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't think there's enough notability yet. Passing mentions here and there, but no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The references provided do not satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Does not satisfy WP:BIO. freshacconci talktalk 03:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete None of the conditions of WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE appear fulfilled. The article looks like self-promotion by non-notable artist. Enki H. (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.