The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Conservatism in the United Kingdom. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nasty Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to have its' own article. This subject is already covered in the Conservative_Party_(UK) article Rantpaste (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The subject of the article lacks notability. Bmbaker88 (talk) 20:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is overkill to have this if the term "nasty party" is already covered in another page.TH1980 (talk) 01:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge The nomination makes an untrue statement repeated by arguments above: it is not covered in the article Conservative Party (UK), neither the phrase, nor 2002 May's speech using it, nor the general criticisms of Howard and IDS's leaderships. Nonetheless, it could be merged. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge would be better option per Colapeninsula (talk) reasoning. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Sorry to mislead, I thought this was covered directly in the Conservative Party (UK) article. It looks like no-one has ever attempted to add it either, according to WikiBlame (though I might be using that tool wrong, someone should confirm). Can we merge and create a Template:R from non-neutral name redirect, similar to The Torygraph? Personally I still think it should be deleted however - "Nasty Party" is very generic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rantpaste (talk • contribs) 18:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Conservatism in the United Kingdom, where this transient characterization already has all the attention it deserves. --Lockley (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.