The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mushindo Kempo

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article with no independent sources about a made up martial art with no indications of notability. All the article says is that this art was created--I'd have put it up for CSD but I didn't think it fit any of the categories (people, organizations, etc.). Papaursa (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page should be deleted because there is no independent verification of Mushindo Kempo other than that created by Terry Dukes/Shifu Nagaboshi Tomio, and several reliable sources suggesting that the martial art is (a) invented and (b) not notable. Wushinbo (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of significant coverage by third party sources. No real evidence that is passes WP:MANOTE. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete This is a one line article with no independent sources. There's nothing to show notability in the article and my search didn't find anything. Mdtemp (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Ditto. No indication of any notability beyond one man's fantasy.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.