The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. m.o.p 13:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mord Fustang

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Musician of dubious notability. Google news search shows no significant coverage from independent third party publications. Provided references are blogs. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment What about the tract that hit number 1 on Beatport Top 100 Chart? It is a claim of importance, but does this chart mean anything to WP:MUSIC? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
comment Yeah, don't delete this. Kid is going to go huge and will just mean someone else will have to re-write it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.208.13 (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment sounds like damning with faint praise. Following the links and searching Beatport I can't find any evidence that this was No 1. Incidentally Beatport has more than 300,000 tracks available for download - I suspect it is user driven. As there are no independent non-trivial verifiable references I support Delete Porturology (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all 6 of his recordings have only hit a non-notable record chart, the Beatport Top 100 Chart. If they made the Billboard Hot 100 or any other notable record chart this record producer would have a Wikipedia page. Minima © (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because there is not much information on the subject available online, this page was created in order to put all information in one place. Evidence of #1 on the beatport chart can be seen here: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=144038069002992&set=pu.118349101571889&type=1&theater Also, the Beatport Top 100 chart can be seen as one of, and if not the most highly regarded music charts among the international dance and electronic music community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.209.166 (talk) 16:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This looks to be a fairly dynamic chart - how long were they No1. I also think you might have a misunderstanding about wikipaedia - it is not a place to "put all information in one place" but an encyclopaedia to record things that are already notable Porturology (talk) 04:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: sorry but I'm not seeing Beatport as rising to a level significant enough to grant notability. J04n(talk page) 09:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.