The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per Metropolitan90. I only get 125 unique Google hits ([1]), but for someone from the 15th century, that's actually quite a lot. The article does need sources. --Hyperbole 06:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google hit counting is a terrible way of establishing notability for someone who lived 500 years before Google existed. I added an additional source culled from a Google search, which should clear up the sourcing issues significantly. Zetawoof(ζ)18:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep I am not convinced that rulers of countries are inherently notable. Indeed, sufficiently small micro-countries are not even notable themselves (one was recently deleted and the deletion sustained in DRV). Furthermore, the country that he was part of lasted by its own description only a short time period. I think a merge might actually make more sense to some appropriate article if we had one, but since there isn't any obvious merge candidate keeping for now makes sense. JoshuaZ23:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.