The result was speedy close, no result. There's a speedy deletion criterion, WP:G5, that applies to articles created by banned users. Without deciding whether these a worthy of G5 or not, this is not the forum for determining whether some article or another is subject to G5. Bring it up on WP:SPI or something, I don't even know. Other than that, if any of these deserve to be deleted for substantive reason, please nominate them individually. A group nom like this is utterly unhelpful. -- Y not? 15:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article and the other articles I will be listing were created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. The master and their socks have created over 50 articles that have been deleted. I'm looking through all of the articles they have created for those that (1) have not been significantly edited by editors other than socks and sock IPs, (2) either have no references or lack references that establish notability, and (3) for which I have found no reliable sources indicating notability. Some are listed on international stock exchanges, however WP:LISTED is not, by itself, considered to be sufficient for notability. I am not confident that I can determine if these companies are regionally notable, so it may be some of them can be rescued. In any case, because these socks have produced so many non-notable articles, they require scrutiny by the community. This is Part 3, Part 1 is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minera Autlan and Part 2 is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIDERPERU. I am One of Many (talk) 05:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]