- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The arguments for delete are stronger than those for redirect though any editor may create a redirect after deletion if desired. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Filsaime[edit]
- Mike Filsaime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NOTABILITY - see note below Jytdog (talk) 03:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My attention was called to this article by this discussion at WP:COIN. I just did several searches and found no good sources:
As far as I can see the subject of this article fails WP:NOTABILITY. The AfD from 2009 linked above had only 4 respondents and I don't think this would survive today. The article has been subject to a bunch of COI editing, per the tags at the top of the Talk page. Jytdog (talk) 03:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Thin gruel, worryingly thin for a WP:BLP, and not up to the notability of, say, Alan Ralsky. Guy (Help!) 11:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I find the sources given at the previous AfD and found them very lacking as they were mainly just published adverts for get rich quick programs. All my other searches were disappointing in terms of WP:RS, so delete per WP:GNG. Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Suggest this article redirect to The Syndicate (group) Spectra239 (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Syndicate (group).--Dolly Cao (talk) 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect this article to The Syndicate (group).--FRDHU (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.