The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Midwest Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A combination of original research and off-topic material with a hint of WP:SPAM. The first sentence is the only material directly relevant to the topic; the rest is about a line of successors who, if notable, should have their own articles. This topic is not notable; there are no sources available on a search and none are present. Three of the links are useless and the fourth is to the reason, I suggest, that this is all here; someone is trying to drive traffic to a successor's successor. Ubelowme _U ^Me 03:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:ADVERT for sure, and judging from a view of the site's lack of traffic, solely created to bring it up. Another in a long line of radio message boards that always seem to die because moderators get sick of dealing with fighting users (or don't bother with it at all) and libel concerns, nothing special about this one and the 'history' is completely unsourced. Nate • (chatter) 04:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Reads like an advertisement and does not appear to be notable. LogicalCreator (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per LogicalCreator with no reliable sources. Royalbroil 03:45, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.