The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ernest Sweet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am opening this AfD discussion because the nominator, Gravityroom (talk · contribs), ran the process without realising the article had had an earlier AfD. I can't tell if this is the same article / person easily, so it's probably best to run this AfD for its course. I assume it's due to a perceived lack of notability by the nominator. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 08:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete -- per first nom discussion. New evidence of notability has been added, but not enough to go over the top. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reason -- I didn't realize there was a prior AfD, but I also don't see anything notable about this bio. -- Gravityroom (talk) 08:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.