The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to John Foxx. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metamatic Records

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This record label was created by one artist to release his own work. The recordings are already mentioned at John Foxx and John Foxx discography and many other mostly poorly sourced pages about his albums. The page has no independent references and I was unable to find any coverage about the record company other than brief mentions. If not deleted, the page should be redirected to John Foxx. —Anne Delong (talk) 13:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 21:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 21:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 21:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if needed and certainly Redirect to John Foxx, as there's seemingly nothing to suggest better attention from him. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to John Foxx. The results of my searches mirror those of the nominator. !voting redirect instead of delete as "Matamatic" seems a reasonable search term, and reader should be directed to the appropriate topic, Foxx, as Matamatic = John Foxx. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.