The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Collison[edit]

Meghan Collison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am re-nominating this for deletion. In good conscience, I can't justify inclusion of an article that has virtually unverifiable/unsourceable content. For 10 years there has been a BLP sources template and as it sits, the only source is models.com's profile page and an Of The Minute feature. That's all. I'm not denying notability as a model (7 Vogue Italia covers. Prada campaign, etc.) I'm just saying, even with the sources another editor offered in the previous AFD, it cannot sufficiently rise to the level of the guidelines. Trillfendi (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I do not see the level of sourcing here we would need to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The same verbiage on different pages about her. No real secondary sources. Kolma8 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not finding enough in-depth coverage to show that she passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.