The result was keep. east.718 at 08:43, February 1, 2008
Article twice nominated for deletion as a non-notable organization with an intervening DRV (First AfD, intervening DRV, and second AfD). Present draft is now being considered for deletion per recent DRV. Justification for deletion has been notability concerns. Procedural listing, so I am Neutral. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable.
Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations.