The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 13:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lolita (orca) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

lacks notability, reliable 3rd party sources. Appears to include original research. Rtphokie (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Question - How is this a different AfD from the 1st one here ? --Triwbe (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability is asserted in the article. Edward321 (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the new merged article Captive orcas. Maybe better as a section in this article? Aymatth2 (talk) 16:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This is a very notable animal due to its record longevity and the controversy surrounding it. Rlendog (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source. Also [1] shows notability. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.