![]() |
< 18 October | 20 October > |
---|
The result was merge to D12. SarahStierch (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this meets WP:MUSIC or WP:GNG. He only released one album while alive and I don't see where that would make him notable. Prod tag was removed without reason (along with cleanup tags). Dismas|(talk) 23:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet notability requirements for companies. Poor sourcing. Yworo (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not seem to meet Wikipedia:Notability guidelines. Lexlex (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Listcruft. Likely to be incomplete and unmaintainable. Bazonka (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Alexis Gritchenko. SarahStierch (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly a (unsourced) duplicate of Alexis Gritchenko. Any useful content needs to be merged and this poorer article deleted. Otherwise it wil be another 3 years before someone else notices!! Sionk (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to FlightGear. Merge selectively as per WP:NOTCHANGELOG. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:VGSCOPE #9 as an extensive version history. Fails GNG as a subsection, though could be incorporated back into main article. czar · · 20:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by User:Versageek under criteria A7 and G11. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 22:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found basically nothing on the subject in a quick Google search. AutomaticStrikeout 20:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot find secondary sources to support claim of notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find any sources for this individual that indicate notability. I want to assume good faith, but the article feels madeup and the author made this one and only edit two years ago. I think this would have been a prod candidate if created today. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article is an unsourced announcement of a not-yet-released debut album. I'm proposing deletion per WP:NOTADVERTISING. --Stfg (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was reverted and renamed to Makedonski Glas by Rich Farmbrough. The redirect was speedily deleted by Peridon. Non-admin housekeeping closure.--xanchester (t) 23:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity, not notable, local two-person company that is less than 10 years old. http://www.mgservicesonline.com/index.php/about-us pretty much sums it up ColtsScore (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BASEBALL/N. Former minor league baseball player and manager. Penale52 (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Per our policies on BLPs the only effective choice here is to delete the article... However there is no prejudice against recreation as long as the article appropriately meets our standards. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copied from Judi Bari. A seperate page is not needed, for various reasons. TBrandley 17:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12 copyright violation. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jagjit Singh already exists. This is a duplicate. SH 17:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedied as copyvio. Peridon (talk) 21:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like a mass copy from a web site. SH 17:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedied as copyvio. Peridon (talk) 21:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a Copy and Paste of an Internet article. SH 17:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article by one of its members about a non-notable band. References do not give substantial coverage, nor do I find any indication that they meet WP:BAND. DePRODded by the article author in 2010. JohnCD (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not totable Wikipedia:Notability, no content, unlikely to grow beyond a stub. NJR_ZA (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Software which does not appear to be WP:Notable. Tijfo098 (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Once again, clearly this nomination is premature, your allowed to copy text from article's to your own user subpage, it's called userfying an article, and it is allowed. As I've already explained, even if this was eligible for deletion, it would be nominated at miscellany for deletion, not articles for deletion. (non-admin closure) TBrandley 17:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They copied all of wiki and put it in to another page they copied the material from iTunes version history
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Person isn't notable and nor are some of the bits of info about her; poorly written; no links to the references all of which are primary sources TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, but a search on Google reveals little to no notability. Returned sites include social networking sites and sites that reflect information from IMDb (user submitted) and Wikipedia. In this case, the article's major contributor is most likely Ms. Joan M. Blair herself. See her contributions and note the username: Joany. This article acts as a résumé, contains information only the actress would know, and even mentions work in student films. (I came across this article in search of a 1900s to Golden Age actress, Joan Blair.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 16:18, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Environmental governance#Corporations. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Term used exclusively by one organization as far as is available in on the internet. Uses concepts similar to some of the topics listed at Template:Governance. Was Prodded, but creator debates, so brought here. Generally, does meet WP:Notability. Sadads (talk) 15:01, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sadads view has no verification. The term is widely used, see internet. And of course it is not similar to any normal governance definition. Eco Governance is a term that was,is now and will be of growing significance for the future. (Small note: See conflict of interests in Sadads profile) User Ecosupporters 13 October 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecosupporters (talk • contribs) 07:19, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - This is a viable search for Environmental governance#Corporations which covers the material without self promotion. The article Eco Governance has copy-vio's from the single source www.eco-governance.com that is not a reliable source. If this was taken away, the article would boarder on a WP:NEO. All other references that I can find in regards to this are not as a "term" but as organizations and foundations. Pmedema (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable as per WP:BIO Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this would have been a smoother process if there had been more input from other editors. I have never seen an AfD with so few participants. All of our arguing back and forth won’t amount to much if we don’t get more input. However, I think if we did have more eyes, this would be a straightforward delete. With all the scouring for sources and scraping of the bottom of the barrel, you still haven’t managed to put forth anything that convincingly establishes notability.
The 4 sources that you insist meet WP:RS are a mile away IMO. This site[24] looks like nothing more than a repost of Xardel’s resume; it’s not an article on Xardel; it doesn’t involve journalism; there is no evidence of any editorial oversight or fact-checking -- it’s a low quality source. The other 3 sites are no better.[25][26][27]
The other issue here is that the BLPs subject’s personal CV posted at his faculty page at ESSEC does not list him as editor-in-chief, and it can't be simply assumed that the other sources trump Xardel's own CV. And lastly, the journal in question is obscure, low-impact, and long defunct; and I see no examples of anything from the journal itself that indicates that Xardel was ever editor in chief. BTW, this source seems to indicate that Jacques Barraux was EIC of L'Expansion during the time when Xardel was allegedly EIC (i.e., 1987).[28]
So, in summary, there is not sufficient unambiguous evidence that he was editor in chief; the journal itself does not seem to be notable; and even if Xardel was editor in chief and even if the journal were notable, he still wouldn't qualify for a WP page because WP:ACADEMIC states: “"it is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject". There is a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject. Anyhow, we've talked this to death already so let's just hope we get some participants or we'll probably have to re-list the AfD nomination. Rhode Island Red (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. This should not be nominated at AfD, it should be nominated at MfD, although I share Vejvančický's thoughts. (non-admin closure) TBrandley 16:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They copied all of wiki and put it in to another page they copied the material from iTunes version history
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. Article has no sources aside from a link to the official site (which, being a primary source, cannot be used to assert notability) which doesn't appear to mention them anywhere. No evidence of chart success. No relevant hits found in either a news or book search, and nothing for a main web search beyond the odd video, none of which are reliable sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to CHFI-FM. If anyone wishes to merge the pertinent information from this article into CHFI-FM they may use the article history. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Show does not appear to be notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could find trivial mentions related to Rajendra Prasad, but no evidence of "significant coverage". The Sahitya Akademi ref is an entry on his son Nalin Vilochan Sharma. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Emma Shapplin#Discography. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not-notable live recording by Emma Shapplin. — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. As the relevant information has already been covered in Luan Santana. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not-notable live album released by Brazilian singer Luan Santana. I made a Google Search and came with nothing to prove notability. — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Megadeth discography. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Simply not notable. Apparently, this WAS to be released as a DVD, but nothing has been heard about this project for a long time, so it is probably safe to figure that it isn't going to be released. With that said, that makes it really nothing more than an article about a single concert, whose only accolade is that it was broadcast live on some pay-per-view channel. L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe this subject meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG standards. And Adoil Descended (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable video game. App game with no indication that it meets notability requirements. The given links are to the company page and the game's trailer, and to a page about a video game conference that makes no mention of this game. TexasAndroid (talk) 13:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Scott Mac 15:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Unable to establish organizational notability. Both citations provided are dead links, lacking historical archived copies; unable to verify content or notability in accordance with WP:ORG or the general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Cindy(talk to me) 12:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Archdeacon of Barnstaple. Equivalent to a merger, as all the information from the source article is already at the target location. Sandstein 07:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Appears to fail WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. GBooks search produces 5 hits, none of which are significant coverage as far as I can see. This merely verifies that he was Archdeacon of Barnstaple. Google web search returns mostly Wikipedia and its mirrors. Other searches return nothing. !Voters may wish to search for William Fitzrogo as an alternate spelling. Unless the position of archdeacon confers notability (and I don't see why it would), I see no reason to keep this. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 10:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have had three similar articles proposed recently so...... please read these Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John_Plemth Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Tuttebury Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas de Bodham to see if it helps whether we should have a mass deletion of similar articles I think now would be the time to decide this once and for all Bashereyre (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Wifione Message 14:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I looked around. The subject or Kibology doesn't appear to be notable. Checked Google News across all date range. A few mentions, but no major coverage. This person has been nominated for deletion twice in 2005, but the argument provided for notability was lacking in both nomination. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 10:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfied to User talk:Corn cheese/Rise of the Zombies Wifione Message 14:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
meets wp:crystal, based on one reference that looks like a fan page. Could not find anything verifiable on google about premier of this film. Wikishagnik (talk) 06:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:Soldier notability Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Doolittle Raid. Although I'm redirecting the article, for editors interested in merging, I've not deleted the history before redirecting; therefore they could easily get material to merge subsequently. Wifione Message 13:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A World War II, United Stated Army pilot who co-piloted a plane during the Doolittle Raid. He co-piloted the plane Doolittle was on. Unfortunately, Cole does not meet WP:SOLDIER as he was not a flag officer, did not receive the Medal of Honor or multiple Distinguish Service Crosses and did not command a substantial body of troops. While the Doolittle Raid is famous, all 75+ people involved do not warrant an individual article. Cole is mentioned in the Doolittle Raid Wikipedia article as one of the last 5 surviving raiders. There is some news media on Cole, especially related to the 70th anniversary of the raid, but the stories give a paragraph of what he and/or the crew did in the raid or have quotes from him. I can see a Wikipedia article that gives some detail on what happened to each plane and their crew, but until then, a redirect to the raid's article could be a solution. Prod was contested with "Not a chance" and a plea for discussion on the talk page, but they have not engaged in discussion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Delete all Wifione Message 13:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Following the process here - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination) and here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels, I am confident that we have both policy (NOTDIR) and precedent working against Wikipedia hosting these articles. They serve no purpose despite claims that WP:USEFUL can be invoked. It's not useful, in any sense, to have a list of television channels on a website which can be edited for good or bad purposes at the whim of anyone who feels like it. It's not necessary to show channel listings when Sky subscribers already have a channel guide in front of them by pressing a button on their remote control. It's against WP:NOTDIR to have television guides as articles, and the two AfDs linked above show that this definition has been widened to include channel guides too. I will contact editors from these nominations after completing this one to make them aware of my decision to use their deletions as inspiration for this one. doktorb wordsdeeds 06:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Channel lists
|
---|
|
The result was keep. Wifione Message 13:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Horrible writing. Doesn't even make much sense. Leontopodium alpinum (talk) 05:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Wifione Message 13:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Completely non-notable, despite the hyperbole in the writing. Reads as a promotional article by the subject, complete with what appears to be a press release. Leontopodium alpinum (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest not to delete as He is well known Gujarati Actor and worked in many Gujarati Films mainly popular in rural audience. I suggest clean-up and reconstruction. --Nizil (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. For Leontopodium alpinum - who seems as feisty as they come - there might be sense in reviewing our reliable sourcing guidelines appropriately before nominating articles further. Please feel free to write to me for assistance. Wifione Message 13:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Reads like an advert written by the subject, completely unsourced and poorly written. Leontopodium alpinum (talk) 04:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione Message 13:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a directory. PROD removed by article creator. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 03:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione Message 13:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:MADEUP issue, as well as a notability problem Go Phightins! 03:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Neptune (Toshinobu Kubota album). While delete is the apparent consensus, I'm given to believe that the merge suggestion by Sysmithfan is not one that others may be averse to. If they are, please request me on my talk page and I'll delete this article. Otherwise, the decision is merge for now. Wifione Message 13:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CONCERT#Notability. Tour without any coverage in independent reliable sources. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:44, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
**Note to admin: the above "keep" !vote is the second by this user in this AfD. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Green_Day_discography#Live_albums. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS: No evidence of any significant secondary source coverage. In 8.5 years the article has never consisted of anything more than an infobox, lead sentence, and tracklist, nor can it since no sources seem to give it any more coverage than that. The only source ever cited is simply a listing at Allmusic that consists of nothing more than the cover art and tracklisting. I performed a good-faith search for sources in all the usual places one might expect to find coverage of an album, particularly one by an artist as notable as Green Day: These included Allmusic, Billboard, Metacritic, Google News, Google Books, and a plain ol' Google web search. Nothing I found went into any detail beyond a tracklist, nor gave any indication of any in-depth coverage, critical analysis, or anything other than a passing mention. IllaZilla (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Wifione Message 13:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Short lived game that is now retired not sure if notable enough. JayJayTalk to me 02:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Green_Day_discography#Live_albums. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS: No evidence of any significant secondary source coverage. Article has been entirely unsourced since its creation 7.5 years ago and has never consisted of anything more than an infobox, lead sentence, and tracklist, nor can it since no sources seem to give it any more coverage than that. I performed a good-faith search for sources in all the usual places one might expect to find coverage of an album, particularly one by an artist as notable as Green Day: These included Allmusic, Billboard, Metacritic, Google News, Google Books, and a plain ol' Google web search. Nothing I found went into any detail beyond a tracklist, nor gave any indication of any in-depth coverage, critical analysis, or anything other than a passing mention. IllaZilla (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Double Teamed. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Without discrediting Qworty or Uzma's arguments, it's quite evident that the sourcing issues might be easily overcome with some effort. Current sourcing details provided do give one confidence of this article's notability promise and so do the keep !votes. Wifione Message 13:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like a case of WP:CRYSTAL for a game and film project that never came to anything. But I could be wrong, needs looking at by peoplewho know the sector SpinningSpark 01:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep:Proves itself to be useful,seems stable.Here are some links,
www.ign.com/games/ni-oh/ps3-711566
www.gamespot.com/ni-oh
ps3.gamespy.com/playstation-3/oni
www.1up.com/games/ps3/ni-oh
ca.ign.com/images/games/ni-oh-ps3-711566
98.71.52.142 (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite journal))
: |section=
ignored (help)Still pretty; still very mysterious. Pub. Koei Dev. Koei
((cite journal))
: |section=
ignored (help)The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article was previously deleted through a bundelled AfD (see articles talk page). PROD was contested but still notability has not been established with reliable references. Peter Rehse (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't assert notability with reliable sources. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 00:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione Message 12:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not cite sources establishing its notability, and a search does not turn up reliable secondary-source coverage. Hence it fails the WP:GNG test and WP:NWEB. Batard0 (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If page survives AfD, should be moved to Chinese for Europeans as the proper name of the project - see http://www.chinese4.eu/. PamD 10:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (and rename as above) - have improved the article somewhat. PamD 11:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep no consensus. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 02:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It has no references as to why, it is notable. Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No reliable sources presented to show the State of Arianiti ever existed. We don't create history, we report history using sources to actual evidence. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 06:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This state never existed. In 1432 Berat was already part of the Ottoman Empire since 1417. In 1431/1432 Ottoman census of the Sanjak of Albania Berat is surveyed as important Ottoman town. During Arianiti's 1432 revolt insurgents failed to capture any important town and rebellion was crushed in 1436. Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable freelance journalist under WP:GNG. Runner up for an award, and there's been other coverage of routine job moves, but nothing more and nothing rises to significant coverage in reliable sources. Batard0 (talk) 18:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If there is a case of impersonation, we must take it seriously. In this case, it seems the evidence is not entirely clear. A remaining possibility is that both pseudonyms refer to the same person. However, I took into account that Francesca Felucci had earlier been deleted as non-notable. It seems that greater harm will be potentially be done by keeping the article than by deleting it, and it seemed that relisting would not likely uncover new information. There are various routes for undeletion requests if someone can come up with convincing evidence that she exists and is notable, and what the connection between the two personas may be. However, it seems that even then, the article will need extensive work to remove incorrect claims, and therefore it may, in that event, be best to start afresh. Samsara (FA • FP) 18:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Person Deziree Ramirez is a hoax and does not exist. Person(s) is also an impostor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nothinglastsforever (talk • contribs) 14:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Every sourced link on this page concerning Deziree Ramirez is using the pictures of european model NSFW Francesca Felucci. 14:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
User has created a fake IMDB page for added notability.
Deziree Ramirez never appeared in playboy. Searchable database here:
Links for proof that Deziree Ramirez does not exist [ALL NSFW] and is impersonating Francesca Felucci:
Creator of this article Texasknowsbest and their history is associated with this page alone and subsquent related and created links to this page.
Furthermore the Real Housewives of Dallas (another deletion possiblity) is not in production according to Bravo and they've never heard of Deziree Ramirez http://www.gossipcop.com/real-housewives-of-dallas-cast-deziree-ramirez/ http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/03/andy-cohen-real-housewives-of-dallas-is-not-happening.html Nothinglastsforever (talk) 13:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Shin Suk-ja. There is no inherent notability of either daughter and from all the English sources listed (with the exclusion of the UN resolution) the notability does appear to rest with Shin Suk-ja. However, if someone can reference reliable Korean sources that indeed address either daughter as being independently notable then I have no prejudice to the articles being recreated. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest redirecting to Shin Suk-ja. Hae-won is only notable for being the daughter of Shin, so there is nothing further being explained here that isn't already mentioned at Shin's article. Your Lord and Master (talk) 08:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Shin Suk-ja. There is no inherent notability of either daughter and from all the English sources listed (with the exclusion of the UN resolution) the notability does appear to rest with Shin Suk-ja. However, if someone can reference reliable Korean sources that indeed address either daughter as being independently notable then I have no prejudice to the articles being recreated. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest redirecting to Shin Suk-ja. Kyu-won is only notable for being the daughter of Shin, so there is nothing further being explained here that isn't already mentioned at Shin's article. Your Lord and Master (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Diocese of Stockholm (Church of Sweden). — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 05:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced affair without sources or proof of notability. Fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 00:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 04:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One-liner without sources and no proof of notability The Banner talk 00:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This was tagged for proposed deletion by Blanchardb with the following rationale. "Stub presenting the findings of one study as absolute truth. ("Research shows..." without specifying what kind of research)." I agree with that assessment and I also feel that there's little evidence that this is an encyclopedic topic to begin with. On the talk page, one user has explained that this page will be updated weekly as part of a course but if the topic is not a valid one for an article, then this class project is just using Wikipedia as a free web host and collaboration platform. If kept, this should at the very least be moved into user space until it has developed. Pichpich (talk) 03:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Orange County Public Schools. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 04:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No claims of notability, awards or distinctions. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((Wikipedia_Talk:Articles for deletion/Paris Hilton's My New BFF (Season 1)