The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable organization. This is the second incarnation of this article, the first previously deleted had proper capitalization. No proper explanation as to why the speedy deletion tag was removed. 14 Gogle hits, nothing in Google news. Corvus cornixtalk 23:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fortunately google news is not a true reflection of the the world news and should not be used as gauge of popularity. Google itself and other search engines do produce more results. In any case 14 is more than enough! The article has been edited to now include proper capitalization. You are correct that this is the second version of this article after the comments of others were taken onboard. Clowe01 (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Faith (George Michael album). L'Aquatique[talk] 02:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a song on a notable album, granted, but it was never released as a single and I don't think I've heard it in my entire life. As the article goes, it's a stub lacking any references. Red157(talk • contribs) 23:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 00:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any claim to notability in the article. There are no external sources for this article other than the sourceforge page to download it. A quick Google search doesn't reveal any news about it. Miami33139 (talk) 23:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as attack page. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No sources to establish notability and unable to locate anything on Google. Nick—Contact/Contribs 23:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 00:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable television programme. Source for notability are self-published. Any verifiable information should be merged to Prem Rawat or articles on his organization. Kelly hi! 22:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An English singer/songwriter who does not meet the criteria for an article in the encyclopedia per WP:MUSIC. Previously deleted after being prodded. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article should be mergeddeleted and any notable content placed in Prem Rawat. Kelly hi! 22:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete due to lack of any outside sources. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Self promotional article created by User:Gabriel Moginot who has also been hard at work writing his own article at Gabriel Moginot, which has been deleted two or three times already. That user has been trying to use Wikipedia to launch his career as a budding photographer by inserting numerous images (probably copyrighted) into any article even remotely related to the title of the picture. Any google hits on this subject trace back to a myspace page and there is little or no other information about it. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined a speedy on this because I couldn't find a good criteria to delete it under (it's not online from the indications therein, it's not a person, it's not a group, it's not vandalism, and it doesn't read like advertising), and we don't have a ((db|IAR)) tag hanging around anywhere. This is a homemade film, no sources, no notability, no nothing. Delete, and if someone comes up with a category it fits in, make that a speedy. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Claims like "Acronyms are popular in the Philippines" are original research. List itself is just a collection of acronyms and what they stand for, not much in the way of notability and no encyclopedic value. maxsch (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know there's endemic bias when it comes to the coverage of non-Western performers, but there's no real claim of notability here, and nothing to verify his notablity. A search for '"Irfan Khan" Brekhna' comes up with 32 Google hits, nothing of them a reliable source. Nothing in Google news. Corvus cornixtalk 22:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just one of his songs, viewed 25,000 times. --69.94.212.91 (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNsQ3C7puk0 Again viewed 15,000 times. Now he is not on the cover of Time Magazine. But in that specifc region of the world, he is very well known. --69.94.212.91 (talk) 06:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.desrevespleinlemonde.com/reves_adultes_pakistan.htm --Kqadir 14:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kqadir (talk • contribs)
--69.94.212.91 (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article confuses me. This is tagged as "disambiguation" but it "disambiguates" different meanings of the word inadequacy, none of which are encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a dictionary per WP:DICDEF. Tavix (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Pointing stick. BJTalk 21:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Idiotic neologism. Contested prod so wasting everyone's time doing it the hard way. – iridescent 21:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Orbit Communications Company. Cirt (talk) 23:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable cable television channel that doesn't appear to have any non-trivial coverage in secondary sources. A handful of mentions on Google relate to it being offered with various satellite TV packages, but it seems that nobody has commented on the channel itself. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article about an artist whose notability I can not establish. He certainly exists - he has a website, and has interviewed musicians for a few magazines - but as an artist, who apparently has collaborated with Peter Blake, I can find no mention of him. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page because it does not have any notability independent of Bad Horsey (whose notability is under question):
THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of the subject not established. See comments by previous editor on the article's Talk Page. Jack1956 (talk) 21:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Set in the fictional world of Ed, Edd, and Eddy and probably non-notable. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was db-nonsense. Schuym1 (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any reliable sources for this movie. Schuym1 (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. ffm 00:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non notable band, unsigned, fails BAND N and RS CdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 20:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Claims to be a syntax-free computer language. I submit that it is impossible to have a syntax-free language, human or computer. Despite the refs, this language is not notable. - Sgroupace (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input. But ,as I being a person who has tried the language, I can tell that there can be such type of a language . In fact the mechanism is quite simple. It uses natural language processing to process the input text and converts into a specific syntax (through dictionary modes , grammatical operations etc) and later executes it. I hope you may also tried AIML for chatter bots. Karthika.kerala (talk) 20:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced and unverifiable article, possible hoax. DAJF (talk) 03:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Procedural Close article already deleted of some sort (non-admin closure). RockManQ (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No context (whose research project?); title much more general than the article; not clear what the domain of the article is; original research; no references. Largo Plazo (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep per wp:snow. No productive reason to leave this open that I can see. Keeper ǀ 76 14:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, unsourced article, not seeing any claim to lasting notability on google and being "instrumental" without a source, is a weasel word. MBisanz talk 19:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus keep almost two years ago. Band just deleted at AfD and there's still no evidence this album is notable. Adding for the same reason
TravellingCari 19:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This list of characters does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. They are all pretty much one-shot gag characters that have no real importance outside of their one or two appearances (as with many jokes from television shows like The Simpsons and Family Guy). TTN (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Villains in Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo. Content can be merged at editorial discretion. (non-admin closure) Protonk (talk) 06:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 19:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 19:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 19:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Although opinions tend towards merge. Exactly what to do with this article can be worked out on its talk page. Stifle (talk) 09:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Synergy 00:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) sources have been added and consensus seems to be that the article meets WP:N. - Icewedge (talk) 03:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Synergy 00:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was I am not inclined to relist this a third time; there is clearly no consensus to delete.. I am not relisting this a third time; there is clearly Stifle (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable neologism. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 20:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination Withdrawn nominator withdrew AfD (non-admin closure). RockManQ (talk) 04:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE or WP:NOTABILITY and article lacks non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. See also a similar AFD recently in progress at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. West. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect title to Amusement ride. History will be intact per GFDL and to mine for info to expand parent article. Keeper ǀ 76 20:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be a notable form of ride. Prod removed by IP without comment. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable darts player, didn't even play in the Welsh Open, may be WP:HOAX. Raphie (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:PROF. Awards listing are essentially resume padding, and there does not seem to be any claim to fame. No notice of her in the outside the fringe community within which she has been able to garner mention (e.g. Uri Geller's website mentions her as a "scientist" who supports him). Lack of mainstream independent, reliable sources which acknowledge her notability make her article unworthy of Wikipedia and without such sources, editors will be unable to write in a neutral fashion. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypotheses of consciousness and spacetime. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is almost entirely original research (a portion, at least, of which appears to be promoted by Elizabeth Rauscher whose article is also up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Rauscher). Essentially, the article as is inappropriately synthesizes a large number of standard run-of-the-mill statements about spacetime and puts on pretense that they are somehow discussing "consciousness". Let such ideas gain the notice of those in the relevant academic fields before Wikipedia has an article on it, please. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Claims in article of meeting WP:Notability are weak. nba.com doesn't show him having played a professional game; gnews search comes up with few hits about this Tony Grier (many more about a lung transplant patient). Source in article is a wiki; claims of notability there are better, but unsourced. Contested prod. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by Orangemike. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 03:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Recreation of twice-deleted material by CSD; advertising; non-notability. Article could potentially be improved, as per discussion with Tnxman307. — Yavoh 16:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both of you are incorrect in your OPINIONS of "Advertising;Non-Notability". Perhaps you should try actually READING the articles. Slow down, take your time, and check each source to verify how incredibly wrong this petition really is. Also, TNXman should copy the message that is on Yavoh's discussion page. It is a much more persuasive argument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabarke1 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is in the first person and in bad English. It is difficult to see if this character is important, but it smells like self-promotion. All edits appear to be by a single user, except for one early request for expansion. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Also deleted were the images of the staff and paper. L'Aquatique[talk] 02:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable high school newspaper. Can the deleting admin also nuke the photos? Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted as blatant and obvious misinformation (CSD G3). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Probable hoax; zero ghits for the bird, zero for the alleged discoverer; prod was removed by an anon who, in the same edit, made the text even more ridiculous. Russ (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. ffm 00:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No citations to multiple third-party reliable sources to establish notability. All but one citation is for plot, and is cited only to primary sources. Single "real-world" citation is to an unreliable source and is a one-line bit of trivia. --EEMIV (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:POV / WP:OR list of "notable players". Category:Persepolis FC players serves the same purpose. --Jimbo[online] 14:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company which fails WP:ORG. Author removed PROD without giving a reason. JD554 (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability guidelines. Jordan Contribs 13:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for things made up at work one day. 2 results on google. The revised search has 5 pages of results, but none appear to be relevant. WP:OR, WP:V, even possibly WP:NEO problems. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 12:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Only one editor supported deletion, and that only conditionally. Article has been improved; nominator has withdrawn nomination, no other deletes. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 22:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising, speedy deletion was contested. The article and all prior versions are nothing more than a product sell sheet. There are no references and is no independently verifiable information. Wikipedia does not need to host a virtual copy of content from a corporate web site. Jehochman Arrr! 12:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant WP:CRYSTAL problems. Only rumoured, and, as the article itself states:
Which isn't promising. Sources cited include imdb (which isn't really reliable), a 6-year old page at thezreview.co.uk which may not be reliable, and another 6-year old page at aintitcool.com, which appears to be a blog. Fails WP:V. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawing nom, keep (as nominator, & non-admin). AllynJ (talk | contribs) 17:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article says he's an amateur player, thus fails WP:ATHLETE. Captaining the Walker Cup team appears is an assertation of notability, but I'm not sure it's enough to cement notability. I couldn't really find many reliable sources with which to establish notability ([26][27]) outside of the Walker Cup mention. I'm not particularly familiar with golf, however, so I might be wrong here, but this fact, with the lack of numerous reliable sources, means this article does not seem to pass WP:BIO. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 12:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent hoax or wishful thinking. No reliable sources found for this; no OfCom licence issued; only relevant Google hit is to a year-old thread on some forum with people the possibility of a launch (and dismissing it). ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ Yo Ho Ho And A Bottle Of Rum 12:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Fram (talk) 07:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I object to the deletion of this article. It already contains a nice collected set of information on Cynder, the character.
Also, more information may be forthcoming that can be added to it once the third game in the spyro series is released and fans thereof have had their chance to contribute their own input.
At a minimum, I think we should wait until then to decide. If we delete it now, anyone who would want to recreate this article with noteworthy information later would have to go through the trouble of checking the history or writing it from scratch.
Shentino (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Spyro_the_Dragon_characters#Cynder <-- That article links here.
I strongly advise preservation of the article's content. Whether or not it is actually deleted or not, the content must be preserved. Before this article is deleted (which I still vote against), the content needs to be relocated.
Shentino (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
unnecessary - a sub-subgenre, content should be merged with UK Garage or 2Step garage at very best. whilst referenced to a point, fails WP:N. article concerns a subgenre of garage, a descendent of drum and bass, which in turn is a derivative of jungle (this issue is widespread; garage is already a genre divisive enough to warrant two articles). Anyay in summation nothing is achieved by splintering the genre further. comments at Talk:Dubstep are also worth consideration --Kaini (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Time's up. Stifle (talk) 09:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While this artist has worked with notable people, I do not believe that this notability is inherited or transferable. Lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications and fails WP:MUSIC guidelines too. JBsupreme (talk) 05:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I would normally close an AFD like this as merge or no consensus, but the article is completely bereft of sources which would be required in the merge target. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
autobiography of a non notable musician. lacks significant coverage in outside reliable sources. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted as an obvious hoax (CSD G3). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails to establish that the term it discusses exists, let alone that it is notable. After I PRODed the article for this reason, the author erased my comments on the Talk page and then responded that he had updated the article to show that "vroomtones" exist, but it still doesn't and neither do his references. A Google search shows that the only use of the word is in a single reader comment on a blog page claiming their existence. I've restored my comments to the Talk page. Largo Plazo (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Outcome: the article was speedily deleted. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Upon further review, the arguments presented by most of the Keeps were without merit, and they all seemed to have a COI. ffm 20:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. ffm 00:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
I don't think this qualifies for speedy deletion, as there seems to be some claim to notability. However, those claims are not backed up by any reliable sources. This article does not fulfill notability per WP:CREATIVE. In a few years she may be notable, but at the moment is not freshacconci talktalk 11:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The two main contributing editors Vaishal and Tshuku are both SPA editors... COI?. TeapotgeorgeTalk 20:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. fish&karate 10:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As stated in the first line, this is an unreleased album, and asserts no reason why an unreleased album is worthy of an article. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, just noticed a whole load of other "unreleased albums" by this band that have articles. To have so many unreleased studio albums may be notable, and could be mentioned on the band article, but is there any need for separate articles on each, especially as reliable sources will be difficult to find to verify. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted as blatant copyright infringement. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article is a copy right violation of nljo.org. Text appears to be simply copied here. That would be reason enough to delete it. Moreover the article reads like an advertisement and does not assert notability. C mon (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Animax Asia. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable station/offshoot which fails to be verifiable due to lack of sourcing to reliable 3rd parties covering the subject in a significant manner. PROD and PROD2 tags removed without explaination. Additionally, much of the article is an exact duplicate of the other Animax articles Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Animax Korea can merge with Animax Asia because there is Animax Korea wiki Korean page but Animax India should not be merge with Animax Asia because Animax India (South Asia)'s programming differs from Animax Asia and the channels in East Asia, and is not a separate feed of Animax Asia, its broadcast by and is a sister channel of SONY TV India based in India. Animax Japan and Animax India while based in Asia are different from Animax Asia, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, in programming, management and broadcasting and there are many more reasons in it----Sumit (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism, no sources, probably unverifiable. Was prodded, prod removed by author without improvement. Huon (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to KDE#Identity. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable mascot(s). VG ☎ 08:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Konqi is already covered in the page for KDE. This article is nothing but trivia. VG ☎ 08:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Synergy 00:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Non-notable book, fails WP:BK. Admittedly, it was originally printed in 1923, so producing sources and references to pass the notability criteria would be hard - however, it was reprinted in 1996 and I haven't seen anything about the reprint that would pass WP:BK. No article about the author to redirect to. CultureDrone (talk) 07:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy close - author blanked and userfied page. NAC. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources exist to show that shooting has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ffm 00:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sub-stub accusing someone of being a terrorist. No real details, with very thin sourcing for such an explosive charge, not to mention somewhat confusing--he's described as 'A Canadian living illegally in Montreal', which, if he really is Canadian, is difficult to imagine how it would be illegal for him live in his own country. Standard article improvement tags have been meet with outright hostility and removal, but little real improvement or, indeed, evidence that this living individual either qualifies for an article or deserves such labelling. CalendarWatcher (talk) 06:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. ffm 00:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While the article and references demonstrate the notability of microfinance and the reality of poverty in rural China, the online references do NOT demonstrate in any way the notability (or even verify the activities) of the subject of the article. Specifically, the only ones that discuss the organization itself (at least, in English) are the organization's own pages. The other references (New York Times, etc.) do not mention Wokai at all. The main contributor's edits to Wikipedia seem to be very narrow, so there is no track record of identifying important but thinly referenced organizations that would lead to giving the benefit of the doubt. Bongomatic (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question -- Wokai microloans are by definition very small ($50-$100) and most impactful to an audience in a remote part of the world (rural China). Because references cited are both domestic and foreign, the author asks if additional consideration of the following excerpt from WP:ORG is appropriate in weighing the magnitude of the media footprint: “The source's audience must also be considered; evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability, whereas attention solely by local media is not an indication of notability.” KDguac (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More Nickcruft from Wikialexdx, this time about the classroom set for sketches in All That, which apparently has a name of a school. This is non-notable, original research, and has absolutely no sources to be found. Nate • (chatter) 05:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. ffm 00:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
unverified text about a non-notable person Drmies (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Shortland Street. MBisanz talk 03:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fictional biography of a character introduced only 2 days ago (hence NO indication of significance or longevity is possible) with no real-world context or refrences. dramatic (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources. Also COI, as article was duplicated in author's userspace. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is made clear by his many accolades that Xavier Ruffin is a noteworthy person. If not for his art work, at least for his inspirational story—a young homeless boy, the son of two drug addicts becomes a successful artist and designer with shows at the Smithsonian in Washington D.C.—
There is also the ORI movement that he is pushing forward with a small collective of people. The concept of "art work emitting from the original source with in" through digital media, which has yet to be elaborated on in the article.
and yes, I am or better was ignorent of sub pages and used my user page as a draft. As instucted by wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by X2541 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Snow, NFTphobia. TravellingCari 22:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This neologism (acknowledged as such in the article's talk page) is not a word. It doesn't exist in the OED and there are no hits on the word in Google. Even if it were a word, it would not be notable. Bongomatic (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined the speedy, as it is clearly not nonsense. But is it notable? Quote in NYTimes argues for notability. Seeking consensus. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Synergy 00:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found. ((Db-bio)) removed as carnivals are not people. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Coren (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails Notability requirements. Contains almost no inbound links. - Superflewis (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. TravellingCari 20:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This person is only notable for one thing. The article is also a coatrack to talk about Bush's science and environmental policies. The whole thing also seems like an attack on an individual, in violation of WP policies. Northwestgnome (talk) 02:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Why the heck was this relisted? Nobody called for a delete, really, and the nom withdrew. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy for "not notable" got declined, although both editors agreed it was a borderline case. Suggestion was to take it here, so here it is. [reply]
Delete - My reasoning: I don't think WP:BIO is met at all. Sophia Jansson's father and uncle are fairly notable, and indeed most of the article and refs are actually about them. Sophia gets two sentences. Basically she appears to be just another office manager, working in her father's company. I don't see how that makes her notable. With all due respect, of course. SIS 22:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Changed to keep. The current version[33] is a huge improvement compared to the one I tagged for deletion[34] four days ago. I think notability is now shown and well sourced. I suggest to close this discussion and keep the article. SIS 22:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Basic criteria - Y - There is a presumption of notability in cases where "[the person in question] has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." Here Jansson-Zambra is the subject of a number of reliable independent sources (I believe this is the reason the speedy-delete was twice refuted).
- Additional criteria - YYYYY - "A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included."
- "The person has received a notable award or honor" - Y - Here Jansson-Zambra has been asked to speak at numerous events including invitations from the Finnish consulate in Washington. There is at least an argument that this is something of an honor.
- "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field" - Y - Here Jansson-Zambra provides supervision and oversight for the comics made after the Moomin series and maintains artistic control over the output related to the greater Moomin series (including print, film, and graphic media). She is widely cited in relation to the product line (See below).
- "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors." - Y - I already have provided 6 reputable cites. See the following additional examples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Although arguably not a peer, her aunt also gives her mention in her novel, Rent Spel, and she is the hero of the book Sommarboken by implicit reference. As discussed in the rationale for invalidation of the proposed speedy-delete, the high caliber of many of these citations is above question.
- "The person has played a major role in co-creating, a collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" - Y - As artistic director in charge of oversight she contributes to the development of the greater Moomin series. This series is widely popular in many (33+) countries (See ref). An incomplete list of scholarly works on the series can be found at the fi.wikipedia article.
- "The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention." - Y - (a) Jansson-Zambra's work relates to the Moomin series and as the main author of the series has died Jansson-Zambra's work may be considered either peri- or deutero- rather than proto-canonical. This is significantly monumental in nature. (b) She has taken part in the 31st "Dreams & Visions" Annual Children's Literature Conference and will take part in Helsinki Design Week 2008 in a week or so. She has also been a major part of at least one documentary on her aunt ([37]). (c) evidence of critical attention may be found throughout the sources on the page and those provided here.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable Jedi from Episode II. I don't believe he had even a single line NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 02:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Never mind, eastmain bailed me out again. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I AfD'ed this back in '07 because I couldn't find any sources. The page was later recreated in a nonsensical form, which I rewrote after a hastily withdrawn second afd. At the time, I found only one major source (a now-deleted news article that gave a lot of info on the mall). That source was strong enough for me to give this the benefit of the doubt at first. Well, now, there's no substantial coverage to be found anywhere, so I say it's time to delete it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Tallahassee, Florida#Middle schools. Very little to merge, but the content is under the redirect if anyone wants to integrate it. Stifle (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable middle school, per WP:SCHOOL. No references to establish notability in any other criteria. justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not show notability. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 02:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
possible hoax, no Google hits, chart positions are fake Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Coren (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:BAND. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. fish&karate 10:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article listing the results of Iranian football clubs playing in continental tournaments. IMO this falls under Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, as I can't really see that much point to it. пﮟოьεԻ 57 20:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Hoax. Mr.Z-man 02:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability asserted but no google hits or sources. Suspect hoax. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep. Played in the NFL for several seasons. Clear case of WP:BITE violation. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Biography of a non-notable character; single ref. provided seems to be a search from Ask.com and gives but a few lines of info ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 01:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn nomination. Keeper ǀ 76 14:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This book, upon research, does not appear notable, even though it's about a notable subject. The article, recently created, appears to talk more about the event of the Jonestown massacre than it does the book. I can't find any independent sources that assert definitively that this work of non-fiction is notable (again, the event is notable, without question, but is this recounting of the "story" notable? I think not).The article includes three "sources" that equate to quotes from the author of said book, plus 2 sources about the event, not the book. Keeper ǀ 76 01:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn based on User:Cirt's work. Slinking away slowly :-) Keeper ǀ 76 14:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Posting those book reviews here as well:
There are many more, and I am adding some others directly into the article itself. Cirt (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As well, it's author, journalist Tim Reiterman, is one of the few survivors of the tragedy at Jonestown. He has, in fact, been interviewed about that experience, including a citation of his book, in numerous Television specials and documentaries, including most recently PBS.Mosedschurte (talk) 01:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]The turning point in Jones' drive for power came in 1975, according to Tim Reiterman's and John Jacobs' exhaustive study, "Raven: The Untold Story of the Rev. Jim Jones and his People."
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosedschurte (talk • contribs)The best comprehensive history on Jim Jones and Peoples Temple, Tim Reiterman and John Jacob's Raven . . .
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced content. Will add discussion to WP:FRAT. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary definition of a non-notable term. Tavix (talk) 01:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Metal Slug (series). Cirt (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This race of characters does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The album in question doesn't seem notable. iMatthew (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 11:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability and a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. No references, inline citation or even external links. Almost no content. This article is a similar recreation of the previous article that was deleted, and it doesn't fare much better. Superflewis (talk) 00:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 19:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nn bio John MacReen (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Commander Keane can you please confirm that you have received my email - I had trouble sending it (File size 6MB).
In addition this may help with verifiability.
The result was no consensus. Mr.Z-man 23:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This group is not notable, the article does not establish nor reliably source notability, in fact it is entirely unsourced CdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 19:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nn film John MacReen (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article should be deleted because it is a neologism, and belongs in a dictionary. It is not a broad enough concept for an article. It does not have enough reliable sources to justify notability either. POV pushing too. CdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 00:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 11:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable "mall". It's hardly a strip mall. (yeah, I live near it) The only thing notable, if it's considered notable, is that P.F. Changs and Bonefish Grill are located near it. They are not part of the mall itself. It fails WP:N and WP:RS. Also, the "Wichita Waterfront" is not the name given to the mall itself, but rather to the area as a whole. (mainly because it's located on the water front) Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep after improvements made during the course of this afd. L'Aquatique[talk]
Rather unfortunate that this needs to take up anybody's time or effort. We have here an album track - admittedly from a very notable album by a very notable band, but still just an album track. This was prodded and deleted (by me) for the same reason last year, but was re-added. I prodded it, and in fact the prod was there for the requisite five days, but nobody zapped the article. I would've done so, but it simply slipped my mind. So here we are. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
☎ 10:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:CORP. Cited references are either advertisements for events this group has put on, primary sources, or not related. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources are defined by WP:RS. I'm still having trouble overcoming the objections I noted above, as all of the sources listed seem to be self published blogs and primary sources. A lack of reliable, published, secondary sources is usually a strong indication of questionable notability. Are there any published sources that deal with this organization specifically that we may use for verification (JAMA, etc)? /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 00:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 00:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 00:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my first AFD. In the process of cleaning up the Rahxephon pages, I can find no reason this should exist as a separate page. Almost all the entries are non notable and those that are can be easily integrated into the character page. Westrim (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I should add that the intro has already been integrated into the main page. Westrim (talk) 05:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]