The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete; possible slight merge to hijacker articles. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-22 13:45Z

List of cars used by the 9/11 hijackers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-encyclopedic, non-notable information – Zntrip 01:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 03:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Haha, what's next? List of Pokemon cards owned by the 9/11 hijackers? Someone seems to have put a lot of effort into this, but seeing as there's no connection between these cars and the attacks themselves, I'm going to have to agree that this is completely non-notable. -Elmer Clark 01:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm working on the Karen cards and Simpsons memorabilia used by the 9/11 hijackers in everyday life, you insensitive clod!! --Action Jackson IV 05:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: How about shampoos used by the 9/11 hijackers? That would be negative "product placement". :P Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The types of vehicles driven by the hijackers, and motoring incidents like speeding tickets and impounding of the cars post-attack, while interesting, has no connection to the events that made the hijackers infamous. As such, it is trivia, and should be deleted. -- saberwyn 02:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Trivia. Really crufty. Dragomiloff 02:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, belongs on some mythical 9/11pedia that wouldn't be overrun by conspiracy buffs. --Dhartung | Talk 02:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as completely worthless, non-notable information. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Why on earth would anyone think this is relevent? Resolute 03:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per WP:INTERESTING -- feb^talk 03:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge - do any of the 9/11 related pages have a trivia section? --Action Jackson IV 05:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Neither notable nor encyclopedic. Maxamegalon2000 06:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ... and also mostly WP:OR, it seems. Sandstein 08:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and quickly. WP:NOT#INFO. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 11:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with the articles focusing on the hijackers, or keep. ZimmerBarnes 14:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is completly not needed as it is completely random and can hurt people. (inside) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hiddenhearts (talk • contribs) 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Merge anything relevant into the hijackers articles (I assume the hijackers have articles) Jcuk 20:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There's no evidence to even support that this is list is real. --K.Z ^{Talk • Vandal • Contrib} 22:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the list is amusing and it is well-researched. I see nothing wrong with it. Nardman1 01:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just kidding. Nardman1 02:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no merge whatsoever. You have GOT to be kidding. Listing VINs? --Calton | Talk 01:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I find the information interesting. Some or all of it should be merged into the larger 9/11 articles. - Tronno ( t | c ) 04:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge A well thought out article with interesting, but nevertheless not fully worthwhile. MrMacMan 18:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge relevant information with hijacker articles - this is well-sourced. Extreme emphasis on "relevant information." - Chardish 01:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge relevant info with articles about the hijackers. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 02:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Since the cars were not used in the attacks, the information is irrelevant about 9/11. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Even assuming that the subject were Wiki-suitable, how would one propose to *verify* the content ? Delete -- 62.25.109.196 10:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete listcruft unrelated to 9/11. Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Minutae with no established relevance to the events. 23skidoo 22:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete someone spent a lot of time putting together something that really isn't encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 22:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - but DEFINITELY save the info somewhere, someone (for some reason) has spent a lot of time on it. Thedreamdied 00:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.