The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LCD-Net

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced neologism. Appears to be a proposal by a professor (who happens to have the same name as the article creator), but it hasn't attracted any notice as yet, and certainly not enough to support an article. PROD removed by article creator. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 09:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searching for the title plus "Lowest Cost Denominator Network" reveals a recent grant on the subject [Here], but I didn't see anything else to prove sufficient sources. This concept may indeed become notable, but for now it seems a neologism per Nom. Celtechm (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I do not see the coverage needed to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.