The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyo Rioku Jutsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; can't find any reliable, third-party coverage Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 22:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unsourced article about an organization with no signs of notability. 131.118.229.18 (talk) 15:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This seems like a no-brainer. The article has no sources and makes no claims of notability. There's certainly nothing there to show it passes WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Colonel Tom 09:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.