The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete with no prejudice whatsoever to a recreated article using appropriate sourcing that demonstrates notability to the standards required by policy etc. Daniel (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kobra Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage found to satisfy WP:GNG. Very little claim to notability based on being the first person from a particular minority to join the Australian Army. Dumelow (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Dumelow (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Dumelow (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dumelow (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Looks to me like there is plenty online to meet GNG. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. The first X ethnicity/nationality-Australian to join the Australian Army is not notable. Mztourist (talk) 07:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually on further review, she is the first women of an ethnic ancestry, limited to a particular country (there are also Pakistani Hazara) to join the Australian military. By the very wonding it suggests previously there were Pakistani-Hazara women in the Austrlian military and there were Afghan-Hazara men in the Australian military. If this extremely narrow "first" is enough to justify an article, what is next "first women of Swiss-French descent to join the United States military" and a thousand more?John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the first of x ethnicity to join y military is not enough unless we have significant and sustained levels of coverage, which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Hazara Australians. Not enough third-party coverage for its own article but a sentence or two in that article and a redirect is a valid alternative to deletion. Deus et lex (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.