The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep - sourcing issue seems to be resolved at this point. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 12:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE -- but one article in The Hindu to source this. Note that there is a person in the United States Chicago area with the same name [1]. Brianhe (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So how do we know he is notable without sourcing? – Brianhe (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, he certainly meets WP:ENTERTAINER. You can always consider WP:ATD before nominating articles for deletion. Vensatry (Talk) 17:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.