The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kitarō discography. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ki (Kitaro album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that this album is notable. It is essentially just a track list. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Ancient Journey. Stefan2 (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't pass the notability standards, nothing I could find on the web that could help it to do so. Buggie111 (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Kitarō_discography#Studio_albums - Google News provided nothing so it's likely that any significant sources or chart records are Japanese. Google Books found nothing substantial aside from CD listings. SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Kitarō discography. Not notable enough to have an article of its own. A mention in the discography article should be enough. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.