The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 20:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KIS Sivar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article has no assertion of real-world notability. Lacks any reliable sources and is entirely original research and in-universe plot summary/trivia. Had redirected to work in which it appears, but edit was reverted as "vandalism." --EEMIV (talk) 13:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is harsh and mean to say. 'More?' 14:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fancruftastic. Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons summed up by the nominator. Nuttah (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.