The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete If there were any reliable sources, it would have taken 1/10th the effort to cite them that various accounts have put into vandalizing this page, the article, and associated articles and talk pages and harassing the nominator. [1] This leads to the logical conclusion that the subject is not notable and thus should be deleted. Edward321 (talk) 22:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I created the page. No need for a fight. This is a vendetta and seems Damiens.rf has hired some help. :) .
Comment Melkart, Please stop making personal attacks on other users. Also, please stop blanking the article - as the Afd tag clearly says 'Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed.' Edward321 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.