- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Jane Street Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.
scope_creep talk (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 03:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - None of the unbiased references talk directly about the subject. One discusses the subject taking a lease, but the focus on the leasing market. Another article includes the subject among companies with difficult interviews and explains briefly why the interviews are difficult. The last just lists the subject among a group of high-speed traders. None of this shows notability.--Rpclod (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clear claim to notability, but lack of in depth coverage in reliable sources, so fails WP:ORG. Doesn't the Financial Times and WSJ write in depth about these guys? --Bejnar (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.