The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect (for now) to Statoil; decide what to do later after (if) real-life merger occurs. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-22 10:45Z

Hydro-Statoil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Very short and poorly written article, which provides false information. The merger of these companies not approved yet and the name of merged company not decided yet. Articles Statoil and Norsk Hydro provide more detailed information. It will be possible to decided how to reorganize these pages after the merger will take a place. No need for the new article, reorganizing existing articles will be enough. Beagel 17:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Statoil for now, simplest. --Dhartung | Talk 17:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - someone misinterpreted the info, the companies proposed to merge, not have already. Agreed, reform existing articles. JameiLei 18:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per JameiLeis arguments. Manzhivago

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.