The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect. - Mailer Diablo 00:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Horse ancestry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article is an abbreviated, entirely unreferenced fork of Evolution of the horse. John254 04:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. DS9 Voyager 05:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Redirect to Evolution of the horse. JRHorse 05:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect per above. MER-C 10:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Redirect, pointless fork of a reasonably good article. Lankiveil 11:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete and redirect, just a fork. Terence Ong 16:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Redirect, no need for a fork when the evolution article covers the topic already. TSO1D 16:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect - as above, this article is a duplication of a better and more detailed article. CloudNine 19:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.