The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete; Copyvio. The primary editor admitted copying this and that it's copyrighted by someone else. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honan Bei Shaolin Mei Hua Chuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Notability, unsourced claims are HUGE (oldest chines MA) but the links are all primary so no help there. Plus it's not clear if it's about the art the school or what, ignoring the state of the article (which is a big ask) the claims and tone are unencyclopaedic and from the copyright tag @ the bottom seems like it is a copy an paste job. Nate1481( ^t/_c) 16:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Nate1481( ^t/_c) 16:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete parts are even written in the 1st person--almost surely a copy-and-paste from somewhere else. Not a notable branch. Can redirect to the Meihuazhuang article but not sure this is needed. JJL (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. RogueNinja_talk 02:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.