The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Smith

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure why or how the subject complies with WP:CREATIVE. I Googled "Books of Herman Smith" and barely any high-quality articles came up Isaw, but again, who I am to judge? Article seems to have been created as a reaction to the subject's death. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 22:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not sure how a web search for such a specific phrase tells us anything about notability of a subject who was mostly active in the pre-Internet era, and many articles about notable subjects are created in reaction to their deaths, that being a time when reliable sources are likely to be published. In this case a much more telling indication is that a Worldcat search doesn't seem to find either the author or his "best known" work. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:28, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There aren't any references here, and I couldn't find any to add (admittedly, I only looked online for 5 minutes). Notability not asserted. Colon el Tom 09:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.