The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - if you do a Google search and read some of the third party information on him, you'll find that he arguably meets the standards for having an article. On the other hand, this puff piece is not a worthy article and unless someone rewrites it to assert notability, it is no great loss. -- DS1953talk00:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.