The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. James086^{Talk | Email} 07:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guri (Star Wars) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article makes no assertion of real-world notability for this character. An editor takes exception to redirecting to the single work in which this character appears, stating that the redirect target should include info. on this device -- however, seeing as how there is no real-world content for this background piece, there's really not anything worth integrating. --EEMIV (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. RMHED (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete violates, WP:Plot, WP:WAF and several other policies and guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridernyc (talk • contribs) 00:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article ais entirely "in universe" and therefore has no critical or encyclopedic content. There is nothing here for any reader who is not interested solely in the trivial plot details of this novel. Fancruft, non-notable character, no critical attention to the role or import of the character to the literature it comes from. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and others above, fancruft extraordinaire. RFerreira 07:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.