The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^(?!?) 01:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gurbaksh Chahal

[edit]

nonnotable, vanity Hornplease 19:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanity. Creator & article's share the same name. Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 20:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would say merge with BlueLithium, which seems to be at least somewhat notable, but since it has no current article it would be best to just delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity. What's a defensible innovative technological solution in the ad network space? On second thoughts I don't actually want to know. Dlyons493 Talk 20:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Feel he passes WP:BIO [1][2]. Needs cleanup. - Ganeshk (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be notable within his field.[3] Eluchil404 15:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vanity, as cited above. Created by subject, and a check of his contribs shows this is his only contrib to the wiki...sounds like simple self-promotion. If there's so many awards, why doesn't he list them? Genuine awards and a record of published works would more strongly support notability. Akradecki 20:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a nobody, but presenting at conferences and starting a few start ups or making a few million does not make one notable. It may make you feel important but not notable to the greater public or even in the smaller web advertising business world.--Nick Y. 01:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nick Y and Akradecki. ImpuMozhi 02:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.