The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 20:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gregor Samsa (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This oft-speedy deleted page was restored by A DRV consensus citing evidence of notability, for which, see the DRV. The version here AfD'ed is the most recent, but gems may be found in the article history. This is a procedural listing, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Article makes no attempt whatsoever to assert notability. --Aaron 22:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's a stub, give it a while before deleting it on A7-esque terms.-- Chris is me 22:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It can always be recreated when there's enough to write an article that asserts notability. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless notability is asserted and sourced. ~ trialsanderrors 05:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral per record reviews. Keep if tour reviews can be added. ~ trialsanderrors 06:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless notability asserted Currently a band without any assertion of meeting WP:BAND Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two EPs, plus an album (with reviews) and an apparent international tour is enough for me. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 07:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep The above comments were made about an incomplete version of the article; it was hastily speedy deleted and protected/locked while I was in the process of working on it (literally minutes after I began the creation) and that was the version which was restored. I would hope those that have commented will assess the correct article instead and agree that it (although still a stub) proves evidence of notability, citing sufficient sources. Earl_CG (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - The only thing that saves this entry is the claim of an international tour. That tour information needs to be sourced somehow.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep purely on the basis of the DRV. If it survived it once, it will again. DGG 23:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, because 2 EPs and an album are definitely NOT enough for me, unless Wikipedia has been changed into a directory service for minor bands while I wasn't looking. --Calton | Talk 04:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two EPs add up to more than enough music for a full album, and since there have been reviews published of their albums, they're obviously getting media attention. That passes WP:BAND, which is pretty much the accepted standard for what counts as "minor" around here. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 03:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.