The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyvio by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs). —David Eppstein (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gitanjali Mathur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article does not meet the notability standards for WP:MUSICBIO. The article seems to have been created by her or her agent as a promotional device. The are no independent secondary sources (books, magazine articles, documentaries, etc.) about her. Although her voice does appear on a Grammy-nominated CD, it is as part of a large choir ensemble (named "Conspirare"). This might qualify the ensemble as notable, but not any of the individual choir members. Quonset84 (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Shyamsunder (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:ENTERTAINER. Qworty (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as a copyvio from http://gitanjalimathur.com/about.php -- Whpq (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.