The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete A7 by Hiberniantears. RMHED (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article does not demonstrate notability, does not cite any sources and refers simply to a number of Youtube uploads. Wikipedia ia not an advertising space. There may also be a conflict of interest as the author of the article may also be its subject; if not then the entire page would constitute original research. The article was proposed for deletion, with reasoning explicitly stated, but the author removed the tag. Their explanation of this was that the subject may become notable in the future; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The page may in fact be eligible for speedy deletion. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete, could and should be a CSD A7. The article's title and the author's name combined return only the article we're debating on Google.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't even find any evidence of this existing on YouTube either. Doesn't need an AfD if it fails WP:V that badly.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.