The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 15:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free Speech Radio News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on itself for sourcing, no WP:RS demonstrating its significance Marquis de Faux (talk) 02:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There's definitely a valid potential claim of notability here, but WP:NMEDIA does not grant radio shows an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, if the only sourcing that can be shown is their own self-published content about themselves. It takes reliable source coverage about it, in media independent of it, to clear our notability standards, but none is being shown here. Bearcat (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Just added a reference to article that profiles FSRN shutting down operations [1]. May pass WP:GNG muster, or not. Cllgbksr (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.