The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Reid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Subject does not pass WP:N and fails WP:ATHLETE notability standards as well. Article originally cited no secondary sources of significance; though there is now a list of references, none of them mention the subject in more than an extremely passing sense. Furthermore, the entire article was written by (a) user(s) on the University of Rochester network; I suspect that the author or one of his close friends wrote the whole article (especially since the images uploaded - though several seem of dubious legitimacy in an intellectual property sense - seem to be personal, as far as I can tell), thus violating WP:NOR. This impression is further strengthened by the personal tone and clear original research involved in writing some of the more effusive and reference-less parts of the page... 1of42 (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 23:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.