This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 June 13. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 June 30. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 August 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They are on the billboard 200 now that shows nobility http://www.billboard.com/#/album/falling-in-reverse/the-drug-in-me-is-you/1505677 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesk715 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable "Myspace" band. Article asserts notability based upon band being signed with Epitaph Records, yet bands official Myspace page [1] clearly states "unsigned". Previously CSD'd and then recreated. Chasingsol(talk) 20:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Falling in Reverse is a well known band. Anyone who favors the old ETF with Ronnie in it knows Falling in Reverse. There is even an magazine issue that is based on Ronnie and Falling in Reverse. Ronnie gets out December 15, not too far away. There is no point in deleting the Falling in Reverse page.Tech395 (talk) 03:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
http://thronemagazine.com/ This is the linkTech395 (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]