The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 18:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy blast

[edit]

Pure original research, not sure if it asserts WP:NOTE but has no confirmed sources or for that matter, refs. Article has been existent since 21 August 2004 and not once has a useful citation or external link been added. Merge to List of comic book superpowers#Energy blasts at this time. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing beyond original research. Kind of amusing that it's a physics stub. CitiCat^♫ 18:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per nomination. Energy blasts are rediculously common in fiction, so it should be mentioned. However, I don't think it would pass either WP:NOTE or WP:FICT, and the article's current form does seem pretty "original research" heavy (I wouldn't quite say pure OR). Maybe a quick summary on various "list of superpowers"-type articles would be acceptable, but I doubt it should stay as its own article (and I'm the type of person that's generally against deletion). The world's hungriest paperweight 20:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per HungryPaperweight and Sesshomaru. You Can 't See Me! 22:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete speculative OR about a fictional thing that has nothing in common between a range of wildly disparate range of work of fiction--Victor falk 04:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.