The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy Keep - What is disturbing is the nom is an established experienced user and also an administrator. Perhaps the account was hacked as this appears a form of WP:DISRUPT. You can write an entire book, no less a Wikipedia article, on this topic. --Oakshade (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This one could probably be kept - I nominated it along with a whole bunch of nonnotable bridges, and I didn't realize the historical significance of this. I plan to withdraw this. --Rschen7754 (TC) 01:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.