The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Culinary Depot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the WP:CORP guidelines. Only valid source I can see is this[1] and rest are press releases by Market Wired. Malunrenta (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I find no reliable sources and so this also fails general notability standards as well. The article's tone is more like a "puff" piece or marketing blurb than an encyclopedia article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as corporate spam on an unremarkable business. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.