The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crock (slang) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think there's anything salvageable or notable about this article at all. Maybe the topic is notable. I don't think it is. Especially in its current state. It's astonishing the article was able to survive virtually unchanged since 2006 2004 - [1]...--Coin945 (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Textbook dicdef, article is, well, a crock. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:DICTIONARY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iglooflame (talk • contribs) 16:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above, DICDEF, OR, non-encyclopedic. The crock of the article refers to an item of crockery, i.e. a ceramic pot, which of course might contain something not good. As indeed the article does. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as dictionary definition. Urban dictionary is thattaway. ----> /// Carrite (talk) 19:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.