The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Committee on National Security Systems

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Non-notable intergovernmental committee. Fleeting mentions and routine coverage that doesn't establish independent notability. Redirect to Department of Defense. Longhornsg (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics, Technology, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The committee (under different names) is 70+ years old. Multiple sources exist. Dimawik (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG. No idea why WP:NOTDICTIONARY would be applicable here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep a review of the sources confirms that most of the coverage is indeed fleeting or routine. However, I support keeping government organizations with this level of sourcing. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.