The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 21:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Choi Kwang-Do (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Minimal sources, one on criticisms and one magazinewithout ISSN, for 10 months, has been cleaned up from an advert, but no evidence of notability Nate1481( ^t/_c) 14:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of martial arts-related deletions. -- Nate1481( ^t/_c) 14:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No notability asserted and no reliable sources provided. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 16:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 18:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete what little sources that are provided seem very spurious. Not notable. BMurray 08:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletions. —PC78 00:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - About 48,700 Ghits suggest there might be something to it. --Nehwyn 17:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.