The result was delete. The arguments for keeping the article were not compelling, and the article continues to fail WP:RS, and therefore WP:V and WP:N. The sources provided in the article are either from the subject of the article, or very brief mentions in passing, so they do not qualify as WP:RS. This deletion is not prejudicial, however, so if reliable, independent sources can be found which show notability, the article can be recreated. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
seems like a non-notable magazine, has no secondary sources to establish notability. Pollytyred (talk) 17:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]