The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asif Malik

[edit]

This is a contested prod with no reason given for removal of the tag. It is an unreferenced article about a person who is probably not notable. It is also likely a conflict of interest. Khatru2 06:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 06:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 10:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and Cleanup, okay, the article is very poorly written, but that's no grounds for deletion. I fail to see where the COI is, and even if it exists, I also don't see that as grounds for deletion. If the facts in the article can be verified, I think he might just be notable enough to fall over the threshold. Will change my vote to Delete if no sources for any of this can be found though. Lankiveil 11:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete unless wikified and properly sourced by the end of this AfD Alf photoman 16:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject is notable, but the article has no sources. That doesn't mean it should be deleted. Delete could not find proof of notability. ← ANAS ^Talk? 20:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per nom. I've been unable to find any sources, thus far, besides the name mentioned in the KTRS (AM) article. Also, primary editor of the article immediately removed the AfD header, probably verifying the nom's claims. --Millbrooky 22:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There doesn't seem to be anything here that pushes him over the notability line. Bourne 23:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if well written and well sourced, I would urge deletion for lack of notability. I couldn't find material on Asif Malik even using commercial searchs like Gale-Thompson. Is the first Tamil undertaker in the USA notable? No. Race, creed, color or national origin only provide that kind of notability when the profession has historically and invidiously discriminated against that particular attribute. --Bejnar 23:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Trampik e y ^{(talk to me)(contribs)} 00:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.