The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ffm 01:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Area 58 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article popped up yesterday on a routine flyby of the ((blackproject)) template and its associated links. A cursory glance at the article suggested some notability, but when I get no hits from the google test I became suspicious and asked for an outside opinion from the milhist editors. It seems this article may not be a hoax, but it still has issues with reliable sources, appears to cantain a lot of Original Research, and does not really assert any notability. In lew of this I have decided to file an afd and let the chips fall where they may. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]
• Delete Seems like it's just a hoax. JonCatalán^(Talk) 20:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems like conspiracy theory stuff to me. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Hoax. Schuym1 (talk) 22:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete At best this is original research trying to establish a conspiracy theory. At worst its a hoax. Nick Dowling (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Original research as best. Edward321 (talk) 23:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Some of the material might should be merged into the National Reconnaissance Office or Fort Belvoir articles, but otherwise the article appears to be a bunch of hoo-ha. Cla68 (talk)
• WP:SNOW. JBsupreme (talk) 07:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the truth is out there. Ohconfucius (talk) 09:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.